Opinion
Alabama Begs Supreme Court to Make It Easier to Execute People With Intellectual Disabilities
The bizarre oral argument in Hamm v. Smith shows how decades of case law rooted in science is now under siege at the Supreme Court.
The current and former lawmakers get candid about bipartisan politics, party leadership and the state of the Senate.
Jones is an attorney who has served several political offices over the years, including U.S. attorney for the Northern ...
Former President Joe Biden claimed that his administration actually lowered the price of “everything” — despite data showing prices rising and real wages falling during his term.
The Supreme Court's conservative majority signals a major win for President Trump, poised to overturn a 90-year-old precedent and expand presidential power.
The House on Thursday voted to table a resolution to impeach President Trump after Rep. Al Green (D-Texas) forced a vote on the matter, scuttling the snap impeachment push with the help of ...
New presidents cannot come into office and fire existing officials just to install preferred leaders in their place. But that is exactly what Trump did.
Seth P. Waxman, Smith’s lawyer, told the justices that the lower federal courts in his client’s case correctly applied ...
In his second term, Trump has acted like a belligerent manager of the federal workforce. Trump v. Slaughter could give him ...
The US Supreme Court on Tuesday, December 10, heard oral argument in Hamm vs. Smith, a capital case that could reshape how ...
The Supreme Court should abandon a 90-year-old precedent and decide that President Trump should be permitted to fire Rebecca Slaughter from ...
The case looks at whether the Trump administration, or any future president, can dismiss a member of an independent federal agency.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results